layout

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

The Amazing Spiderman: Oh what a web they weave



I have been on a superhero kick. Don’t ask me why but I’m addicted (and heavily anticipating the Batman film coming out later this summer). This was not a movie I had planned on seeing though…seeing as this series was just done a few years ago and I had been disappointed with the acting and inconsistencies in the story. But the Amazing Spiderman restored my faith in the red and blue spandex suit. 

The acting was far superior to the originals. I’m sorry but no girl in her right mind can come out of this film without a huge crush on Andrew Garfield. He straddled the line between superhero and geek so naturally and effortlessly. He stole my heart as he was attempting to woo Emma Stone. And he did a great job of providing comic relief. I liked that nothing come easy to him, we see him struggle with his new abilities, and with the whole idea of doing good for others with no return. He just made me want to believe in him. Emma Stone was a much more interesting love interest than Kristen Dunst’s Mary-Jane, who always seemed whiny, vulnerable and slightly annoying to me. I preferred Stone’s character overall, she was smart, took action in any situation and was, in my opinion, a great supplement to Spiderman. Where Dunst seemed to be constantly in trouble and unable to take care of herself, Stone was a strong female role in a male dominated hero story. Rock on girl. 

What really held the story together though was the rich back story that we finally received for Spiderman. Peter doesn’t just get bitten randomly. We learn why he was around those spiders in the first place, how they were created, and about the negatives and positives of inter-species genetics. It was interesting because, though the bad guy was a disgusting lizard hybrid that, I will admit, might haunt my dreams for a week or two, his character balanced Spiderman’s. Both characters were affected by genetically modified species, one reaction was positive and one was negative, making the lizard a much better nemesis than the green goblin. I loved learning about Peter’s parents and why their lives were in danger. It helped to build the story and support motivations for the characters, putting the audience in the loop, thus giving us a better reason to cheer our hero on. 

Noteworthy: The cameo by Stan Lee, creator of Spiderman, was hysterical and much needed comic relief in the middle of a very intense fighting scene. He is also the most adorable old man ever.

Friday, July 6, 2012

Ted: Snuggle bear’s coolest accountant




Before I watched this movie I was on the fence.  There is just something weird about a talking teddy bear that swear, drinks and has sex. Then again, at least it’s an original story. My friends gave it rave reviews, so I went with an open mind, hoping that it would live up to the hype. It did, and here’s why.

Let me premise this by saying that if you are a movie snob and only appreciate academy award winners, this is not for you. But if your open to it, besides delivering laughs, Ted had a romantic comedy-esk plot as well as an overall moral. Go figure. Ya, there are a large number of party scenes where they do crazy things, but what were you expecting? This isn’t the Notebook. Ted may be crude, and at sometimes disgusting (there is a scene where there is a shit on the floor, enough said), but he was a great match for Mark Walhberg’s somewhat innocent and immensely immature character, John. It just made sense that someone so lost would have a talking teddy bear as his best friend. Because, as Mila Kunis character points out, how much can someone grow up if they are still bringing their teddy everywhere? I wonder if the writers meant to give Ted a deeper meaning, or if it just happened, because, surprisingly, this bad-mouthed teddy bear has some wisdom to offer. Ted stops fooling around all the time and gets a job. Mark becomes less selfish, more motivated, and begins building a life for himself and his fiancĂ©. Basically, everyone in the film learns how to grow up, a lesson not easily learned and one that I am currently struggling with.

If you are looking for a great example of a well-written comedic script, this is it. The one-liners were awesome, and some of the jokes so unexpected that it kept me interested when the story dragged a bit in the middle. Though many will argue that the Flash Gordon references were stupid, I think they supplemented the idea of immaturity nicely. Especially since that was one of the most ridiculous shows ever to be created.  Overall, Ted did what it was supposed to. It made me laugh so hard I almost fell out of my seat, and weep for the demise of humanity all at the same time. Sounds like a winner to me.  

Noteworthy: The White Trash name game was hilarious. Apparently Mark Walhberg named off about 50 girls names in 30 seconds just off the the top of his head. Impressive. 

Monday, July 2, 2012

The Avengers: Action Packed Fun



There is just something about a superhero that is appealing. So I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that The Avengers was such a knockout hit. For all you people who were worried that you weren’t going to be able to follow because you aren’t a comic book nerd or you haven’t seen all the prequel films, fear not. Though I wouldn’t call this the  "greatest action film of all time,” like some critics, I am a fan of this motley crew and think that they deserve a place on your radar.

I will be the first to admit that I am not a huge fan of CGI, especially in films where the rest is live. So I thought the aliens that were attacking earth, while weird looking, were kind of lame. The plot itself stems from Thor, so if you haven't watched it you should afterward to get the back story. It was smart to have this be the premesis of the movie, however, because Thor had the best plot of the prequels. And the best villian.

I am a huge Loki fan. I have to say that as far as acting goes, even though he is the bad guy, Loki, played by Tom Hiddleson, was amazing. He wasn't just evil for evil's sake, he had a plan and a purpose. You could see the cracks in the surface of his character, like he used to be put together and now he was slightly off his rocker. He straddled the "in control" and "out of control" line expertly. The rest of the acting was above average. Even though he is a jerk, I love Robert Downey Jr.'s Iron Man because of his quick wit and truly complex personality. Whoever wrote his lines did a great job.

The set was beautiful, and one of my favorite parts of the movie. The designers nailed the futuristic look that also fit with modern society. They did a great job of differentiating outer space, the secret agent aircraft and our world, giving them all different feels that were equally convincing and real (John Carter take note). The costumer also had a challenge because each superhero was so unique, and unlike most group action heroes (Fantastic 4 or Watchmen, for example) they did not look like they fit together at all, which was important because it supplemented the internal turmoil in the story.

Mostly this movie was enjoyable because their was a lot going on, it was easy to follow, and the characters were heroes. Everyone, regardless of their acting skills, did a great job of getting you to root for them, even Hawkeye who is evil the first half of the movie. Though I don't think that it should have beat out Harry Potter or Titanic for opening week records, I can see how this film could be enjoyed by many, and why it earned the top spot.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

2081: Significantly terrifying future




I don’t normally write about short films. If given the choice, most of the time I would rather catch up on the latest TV episodes. But this one is important. It’s not cutesy, or witty. It’s extremely sad and kind of terrifying. Based on the short story, Harrison Bergeron, written by Kurt Vonnegut’s, 2081 is the type of movie that even though it will only take 20 minutes of your time, will impact your entire way of thinking. 

It is insane to me that people would want to be equal to the point of losing all sense of self. I have always strived to be as much as an individual as possible, and believed that achieving greatness was a top priority. But instead, imagine the world presented here. Those who are strong bear heavy weights to slow them down, those who are smart are given earpieces that let out sounds to disrupt their thinking, and those who are beautiful wear masks to hide beneath. 

If you read the comments on the Youtube page you’ll see that this is very controversial. Some think the story is stupid, but I think it’s an important literary allegory.  It is obviously a hyperbole, or exaggeration, but it begs the question, is such a future, one in which we all must be equal to the point of extinction, so far off?

If you don’t want to get into the political and social implications of this piece, then at least consider the beauty of it. The music is perfectly placed and appropriate, as are the camera angles and the additions to the script. The acting is extremely well done, I was especially impressed with the unyieldingness of the Handicapper General and the emotions of Harrisons father who truly had to go through the wringer, but in the end forget why. It is moving. Another thing to point out is the only one with a name is Harrison, another distinction that set him apart from the masses. 

No matter what you believe, I hope you watch this film and think about it. Hard. Consider what you want for your future and pray like hell that the world never looks down on those who are lucky enough to be special, as I think we all are.

Friday, June 1, 2012

TV Interlude: FRIENDS



Last night, I settled in for the final episode of Friends. I circulate the seasons at night because I am so comfortable with the show, and know it so well that I literally can stay up and watch or fall asleep comfortably to the sound of their voices. Either way, I feel like it is running through my head constantly. But I stay away from two episodes like the plague because they will make me ball like a baby. The first is the break up episode in season 3, “The One with the Morning After,” (yes I know, it’s pathetic that I know the names of the episodes). Anyone who has ever been cheated on knows that it is a feeling that you don’t want to relive, and every time I watch this episode all I can think about is the jerk who broke my heart. It feels just like that too, you are exhausted all the time and that person is forever changed in your mind, tainted somehow.

The other one is “The Last One” because, well, it’s the end of something, and lord knows I don’t deal with endings well. It is perfect in the fact that it is not actually sad at all, the jokes are well times as usual, the plots wrap up the way you want them to. But for some reason every time Rachel shows up and says “I got off the plane” tears stream down my face. It’s the perfect ending to a ten-season story. It is the ending that we dream for, but seldom get. It is bittersweet, wonderfully entertaining television. 

I am a firm believer in the fact that Friends episodes can solve any problem, if you stay away from the above mentioned episodes for the above mentioned reasons. It’s never not amusing to see Monica in a fat suit, or watch Chandler be girly, or see Ross sport the worst fake tan in the history of the world. Flashbacks are always good stories, and some of my favorite episodes are about nothing,  like the one where they are all just trying to get ready to leave (season 3), or the one with Unagi. The genius is that you can walk in on any episode and feel like you understand and are invested. If you are a diehard like me, by the end of the series these characters were so well developed, in depth, and quirky that they really did feel like friends. You knew how neurotic they were and it made them all the more endearing. 

If you’ve never given it a chance, you should. I have hooked so many people on this show I can’t even count.  The writing is quirky and heartwarming, and no matter how many times I watch these episodes I want more. It is the only show that I have ever felt that way about, and it is the only show that I haven’t gotten annoyed with characters or bored with story lines (I’m a tough critic).

Fav description: 6 normal people. No Sex. Bad Jobs. Hit Show. Go Figure. I guess some things are just meant to be. 

Noteworthy: Still making an impact, here is a recent Friends article that I adore:  http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2012/05/friends-oral-history-top-of-the-rock?mbid=social_retweet

Saturday, May 26, 2012

When Harry Met Sally: Iconic in Every Way


I was bored yesterday after work, but didn't feel like finding a movie on Netflixs that was going to disappoint me, so I popped in the old stand by. Harry Met Sally is the ultimate rom-com, and one of my favorite movies to watch over and over again. There is just something about Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan and the magic of watching the greatest character development of all time.  Any critic will tell you that this film is iconic, but here is why I love it and think you all should give it a chance. 

The plot if somewhat complex, but works. Spanning Harry and Sally’s meetings by five years makes time progress naturally, and also lending to the building of their relationship. Harry and Sally did not see each other and fall head over heels, which, in my opinion is fantastic. Actually, at first they hate each other. But their paths continue to cross and they realize that they balance each other the way that two lovers should.

Though I am the first to admit that Billy Crystal as a player is a bit of a stretch, he steals my heart every time and I find myself falling for it even though I have never known any players that wear cable-knit sweaters. Meg Ryan is brilliant. She plays OCD so well. I love the way they made her ordering so specific and over the top. I think we all know people like this, who just want what they want the way they want it and really, there is nothing wrong with that. Both characters start off a bit annoying and grow into themselves. The writer did a fantastic job of keeping their ideals the same, but letting them mature and have multiple sides.

The big debate for this film is whether or not men and women can be friends. Age old question that I think is the cornerstone to most relationships, and likewise, is the basis for this film. No matter what you believe, I can;t help but notice that the story really supports both sides. Sure Harry and Sally are friends for a long time, but it ends up becoming something more, so doesn't that actually support the idea that they can't be friends? Harry may have a point. They couldn't be friends, they were meant to be more. 

Following the idea of development, one of my favorite things that they did was showcase other couples at breaks in the story, who talk about how they met and how they fell in love. Each couple ends by saying how long they have been together which is normally 35, 45 or 50 years. Most movies today talk about beautiful people getting together and how hot and heavy it is, but we never see something that lasts. They get together for the last scene, but i think it is way more powerful to show the couples who, maybe aren't perfect, but exemplify the relationships we all want. Something real.

Noteworthy: Shout out to the writers who have perfected one liners. I use the saying "white-man's overbite" all the time.
Second shout out to the Sally's hair stylist. If I haven't won you over, you must see this movie for the great 80's hair and clothing. Brilliant. 

Friday, May 11, 2012

TV Interlude: Mad Men


Working for an ad agency makes it essential to watch this show, though I have to say that I don’t get it because at my job I am surrounded by so many women it’s funny. But we are also small scale, so fighting for recognition is a little different. Still, it was demanded of me that I find out what this series is about and, though I am not caught up yet, I have a few thoughts…

First off, the genius of the show lies in the fact that Don Draper is a dog, I mean a truly awful person, but for some reason you root for him. Even when he is trying to hook up with girls that aren’t his wife, like the Jewish store owner in the first season, I’m secretly thinking “come on, just give him a chance.” Weird considering the fact that the reason I dislike most of the other characters is because they are consistent cheaters. 

It is this dislike of the mousey Peggy, and the slimy Pete that makes me want to skip their storyline completely. Is it just me or do they both just constantly whine? It’s the fact that I feel so bad for her and the other wives that I listen to Betty’s woes. They are silly and trivial, but the poor girl can’t help it. I am, however, intrigued by the Barbie-like Joan, who seems to have the whole feminist act down pat. She uses her sexiness the way that many girls do at bars now-a-days, so intentionally and purposefully that the male counterparts don’t realize how manipulative she is. I wonder if guys today have caught on yet. 

The acceptance of cheating and of this lavish lifestyle that the ad men led has me hooked though. I want to see if they will destroy their careers, because, despite it all, they are mildly talented. It is amazing that these lifestyles were the norm in the 1950’s, and that the wives of these men put up with it as much as they did. The tangled dishonest web is hidden by an outer image that is glamorous and wonderful and that is why, I believe, people are hooked. We want to see what will break through. 

I’m only the first season in, so I have yet to make my final decision. 

And, because I bore easily, look out for more TV interludes in the future.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Young Adult: Deep and Depressing Reality



I did not want to see this movie after watching the previews. I did after reading the reviews. Turns out the actual film is somewhere in-between the rants and the raves, in that it is not so much a dark comedy as it is just, well, dark. My friend and I were sorely disappointed that we didn’t laugh at all, just covered our faces in embarrassment for the pathetic sole that is Charlez Theron’s character, Mavin. 


It’s true that this is probably pretty true to life. Very realistic in the fact that some people move away from small towns and are miserable, and others stay and are happy. It’s also true that most of the time, in life, we don’t learn the lessons. We do stupid things, and we continue to do stupid things just because.

The costuming was brilliantly juvinille. I loved that she sported oversized glasses, ratty bun hair and a hello kitty t-shirt with plad pj bottoms most of the time. Very teenage-ish.

The big mistake that was  her age. 37? Really? No one would be that out of control at 37, I’m sorry you just blew it. I think if they had taken ten years off the character I would have been more likely to say “ya, totally.” 


I’m torn about the relationship between Mavin and the loser from high school who bonds with her over their completely selfish and pathetic lifes. It was fine, platonic but cute because they were kindred spirits, until (spoiler alert) they slept together. This ruined the one story line that I actually liked, leaving me feeling hopeless and pissed.


But I guess that was the point of the movie. Life is messy, and most of the time you do something stupid that ruins the good in it. 

Still, I would rather see a happy ending which is why this one fell flat. 

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Hungry for More: The Hunger Games


I thought I would give it some time for the glory of the Hunger Games to settle down before talking about it. For those of you who have read the book, I think you will be pleased by the adaptation, it does a pretty good job of sticking to the story, with some slight tweaks to keep the ball rolling. 

The casting was relatively correct, I say relatively because, though I love her and think she is a tremendous actress, when I was watching the movie I was overcome by the fact that Katniss was just too big. She was about twice the size of some of the other characters and looked like the obvious winner. It was nothing that  Jennifer Lawrence, could do really, she played the part well, her facial expressions were perfect. But she was just…too old, and you could tell. In the scene where Clove is on top of her with a knife, all I kept thinking was, “dude you are twice her size, just throw her off you, there is no way she could pin you like that.”

I was pleasantly surprised with Peeta. He's not my favorite character in the book because he seems, well, weak compared to Katniss, and who wants a guy who's weak? Which is why rugged, manly Gale (though he did not fulfill my expectations but we will get to that in a sec) seemed like the obvious choice of a love interest to me. But in the movie, Josh Hutcherson made me root for him and, more than anything else, he stayed true to the character without overdoing the hopeless romantic stereotype.
Shout outs to the perfection that was Essie and Haymitch. Thumbs down to whoever style Gale, he was supposed to be rugged and poor, not a featured Abecrombie model with perfect hair and not a spec of dirt on his perfectly pressed white shirt. 

The cinematography was the other thing that got my attention. Rarely do I sit in a film and think, “Wow, the camera angles are awesome,” but that is what I was doing during parts of this movie. They did a great job of catching the essence of each moment – with the close ups when something serious was happening, and the longer shots to show how massive the capital was, the bleakness of the Districts or the intense landscape of the games. Some of the shots were just genius, keeping the story close to the audience and making it feel intimate, just like the novel. 

Can't wait for Catching Fire? Neither can I.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Tangled: Why Disney Princesses Rock



No matter how many movies I see, there is something about sitting down to watch a Disney film. As an 80’s - 90’s child, these are the types of movies that I grew up on and so I have high standards for Disney’s animated features. It’s been a while since Disney had a real hit, but Tangled reminded me of all the things I love about Disney. With a simple, classic story, a hero and heroine to root for, a bad guy to hate, sidekicks that almost steal the show and songs that are awesome to sing along to, I thought it was a slam dunk.

Deciding to cover Rapunzel was a promising start because this is a classic story that has not been done. Think about it, how many times have we seen the Snow White adaptations (there are two coming out this summer) or the Cinderella stories (there are at least 10 movies I can think of off the top of my head). But who has done Rapunzel? *crickets*

Disney did a great job of explaining a rich background for our heroes without being wordy or boring. The story book at the beginning actually reminded me a lot of Beauty and the Beast, which is genius. The songs were straight to the point and actually fit with what was going on (a problem some movies have, in my opinion).

Sure it was cutesy and predictable, but wasn’t that the point? At the end we all left feeling good, and humming the tunes that were catchy enough to be running through my head, but not annoyingly so. I hope Disney can scrounge up a few more fairy tales to add to the fabled list. And I hope they can execute it as well as Tangled.

Noteworthy: I’m sorry I never tired of watching the horse beat up on Flynn Rider. It’s just great to see him sit on his haunches and punch Flynn clear in the face.

Note: If you like Tangled, look out for Brave, coming out this June.

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Facebook Frenzy: The Social Network


I don’t think that people realize just how iconic this movie is. When Facebook was in its fledgling stages social media was just starting to emerge and it wasn’t until this site launched that the craze really got out of control. Now, you can get a job in social media, and most people spend a good amount of their time trolling numerous sites. I have heard lectures on how to use it, and been handed books on how it is redefining marketing. Not to mention, recently been living it through my copy writing job, where part of my time is devoted to writing Facebook posts.

So for me, and many other youths of 21st century, social media is defining our age. One that probably should be aptly named the social media craze because, as much as we each pretend like we hate the damn things, truth is without them, and Facebook specifically, we would have no clue what to do with ourselves. The genius of Facebook in particular is that it is the main source of news on the best topic, people we know. What could be more interesting and more important?

People I recommended this movie to mostly came away saying that the dialogue was too fast and hard to follow and that Mark Zutterberg was a douche. First off, the rapid fire dialogue was prefect because that is our society, especially online.Everything is moving a million miles a minute. Secondly, even though he may be
a jerk, I was always rooting for him. Jesse Eisenburg does a good job of being a confused teenager, who doesn’t fit in and just wants to be somebody. I mean don’t we all? I don’t know anyone who hasn’t made it to the top by pushing some people down. That is our world people, and if you don’t think so you are incredibly niave. I’m not saying its right, but come on, what were you expecting?

Noteworthy: The soundtrack could not have been more perfect for this movie. It was simple, with drops of notes highlighting events. It was modern. It was like facebook. No fuss, straight and to the point.

Monday, March 19, 2012

John Carter: Stay on your planet


There is something to be said for movies that seek to do something different, and take you to a different world. Though sci-fi movies aren’t my favorite I recently found myself being dragged to John Carter, Disney’s newest “inspirational” film. Based off a book, the plot was nothing special, a civil war vet is transported to Mars where he becomes a hero and adapts to the new surroundings. Of course there are fight scenes with weird creatures and, like any other Disney movie, he falls in love with the native princess. Overall it kind of screamed “adaptation of Avatar” which in itself was an adaptation of Fern Gully, or Pocohantas, depending on your generational preference. So why see this movie? I’m not really sure. 

Though I am a hard core Disney fan, I wouldn’t have minded missing this one. The acting was mediocre at best, the sets were somewhat boring and the costumes were weak. Leaving me thinking this world would be one worth remaining unvisited. Though it is supposed to be a planet that is near destruction, I still expected a level of creativity, color and wonder. After all, John Carter was still supposed to be drawn to it because of its contrast with the real world. The latter part of the plan was well executed; Virginia was dull and drab, with blacks and greys setting the overall tone for earth. But Mars (or Barsoom as they call it) was drab too, just with a stronger use of earth tones. The wonder just wasn’t there, leaving me unimpressed with the made up world. 

The most disappointing part, and where the movie truly failed, was the author’s disregard of John Carter’s new found strength. Though he used his ability to jump we barely see him fight without a weapon. It is pointed out at the beginning, and then disregarded, so why even say it in the first place?

Noteworthy: Though he was a bit frumpy looking, and reminded me of Flubber gone wrong, the little dog that is loyal to Carter throughout the movie adds some comic relief and is adorable. Everyone loves a good pet side kick after all.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

HappyThankYouMorePlease: Exactly right.



Josh Radnor has stolen my heart, and just in time too because his character on How I Met Your Mother is getting a little dull. This movie, written, directed and starred in, by the sitcom celeb, makes me proud to know that there are still indie films that are true to their title. HappyThankYouMorePlease got it right.

There are four main plots, that are somewhat woven together, but also relatively separate. The genius is that they are all about people on the cusp of becoming great, and being loved, and the things that stand in their way.

Sam is a lost, mediocre writer who self-admittedly is “afraid of success,” and love. In a strange string of events, he decides to take responsibility for kid who gets separated from his family on the subway. The child, Rasheen, attaches to Sam because after being shuffled from family to family in foster care, he for some reason feels more comfortable with a stranger than in “the system.” Soon after, he makes a strange deal with a bartender to have her live with him for three days (in order to avoid the inevitable one night stand scenario).

His best friend Annie, played by Malin Akerman, is obsessed with beauty, and trapped by her alopecia. When she is pursued by a guy she deems “less than beautiful,” she immediately blows him off, taking her the remainder of the movie to realize that beauty really is more than just skin deep. In a their final scene, he has her close her eyes and just listen to him and, for once, she really hear how amazing he is, transforming his whole image instantly.  

Sam’s cousin, Mary, is madly in love with her boyfriend but is deeply afraid of commitment. Coming from a “long line of divorced people,” she doesn’t believe that relationships can last and therefore pushes her boyfriend away every chance that she gets.

Noteworthy: The writing is relatively impressive, and stays true to providing the audience with the “indie wisdom” that we have come to expect. “Go out and get yourself loved.” If that is not awesome for its obvious bluntness, I don’t know what is.

Sidenote: If you like this, stay tuned for Liberal Arts, also directed by Randor, starting Zac Efron and Elizabeth Olsen.

Monday, February 20, 2012

What’s Eating Gilbert Grape?



First off, whoever named this movie is a genius, I love this title, and it is so appropriate for this film. A movie about people who are trapped in their own situations could not have been more perfectly portrayed. Though Johnny Depp with long auburn hair took some getting used to.

I was most impressed, however, with the young Leonardo DiCaprio, pre-titanic hype. He brilliantly executed the portrayal of Arnie, a mentally retarded 18 year-old. Having worked with many different mentally disabled children myself, I could see them in him. The way that he moved, and handled his hands was way more accurate than I have seen in previous portrayals (sorry Shia, Leo’s got you beat).

I don’t think you can watch this movie without seeing yourself in someone. Mama is trapped in her own 400 lb. body that embarrasses her so much, it drives her to eat more and trap herself inside the house.  Arnie is trapped in his damaged brain, and is unable to change his behavior no matter how often he is scolded, demonstrated by the fact that he continuously tries to climb up a water tower. The housewife is trapped in a life she didn’t envision for herself, seeking refuge from Gilbert, though I don’t think she ever cares much about that relationship or the one with her husband, seeing as she blatantly tries to sabotage both. Gilbert is simply caught in a world that he believes is impossible to escape from. The movie is gritty and real. Possibly a bit slow as it shows the average, everyday bothers, but it is necessary in creating a true view of this world. Beautifully acted and touching, this one is worth watching.

Noteworthy: Johnny and Leo pre-hype. This movie was before either of them had the pressure to be “true to their image,” so they really succeeded in channeling the characters. They weren’t “Leo as Arnie” or “Johnny as Gilbert,” they really lost themselves. Now don’t get me wrong, I am a huge fan of both actors still and go see all of their films, but watching Gilbert Grape made me wish they hadn’t gotten so famous and lost that innocence because it really showcased their talent.

This Means War: Handler Hilarity



This is not one of those movies that I am going to over analyze because, lets face it, there’s not much more to it than surface level. This Means War is about two hot CIA agents who fall for the same girl. Boom, let the chaos ensue. The plot is weak, and relatively unoriginal, basically driven by the hotness of it’s leading men. The acting is less than stellar; there will be no Oscar noms. But I would be lying if I said that I don’t enjoy a throwaway rom com every now and again.

Reese Witherspoon plays the sweet girl next-door with an independent woman edge. She was cute and feisty, nothing that we haven’t seen in her other films (Sweet Home Alabama or Just Like Heaven, for example) but still endearing. The main highlight was Chelsea Handler as a supporting character who basically mirrors Handler’s real-life persona, only married with children. She was hysterical. I say more Chelsea Handler movies because, if nothing else, you leave laughing.

This movie fits the bill for date nights, girls nights, or when you could use a laugh. I won’t add it to my personal collection, but I didn’t mind spending the $7.50.

Monday, February 13, 2012

The Vow: I Don't Know


When I saw previews for this movie, I am ashamed to say that I was excited that another lovey-dovey sob story was coming out. In case you haven’t noticed, underneath all the cynicism, I am a self-proclaimed hopeless romantic. The Vow promised to make me feel the way that The Notebook did, or so I thought.

The surface level plot was alright, Leo (Channing Tatum) trying to win Paige (Rachel McAdams) back because she can’t remember him is incredibly reminiscent of the Notebook. The problem was the rest of it. The parents and ex-boyfriend who wanted to give her a do-over, and her decisions to just run away to the familiar instead of trying to remember. It created a story of frustration, one in which the good guy always seemed to get the short stick. The problem was that this rising action was never resolved. There was no climax, or resolution, they just gave up. This made my chick-flick loving girlfriends and I feel incredibly cheated. Why in the world did we go through all that pain, if they weren’t going to rediscovery their love in a passionate, over-the-top reunion scene?

The sadness itself was a waste. I find that most movies have moments with great writing where tears stream down my face, and this is a sort or release. It allows all the sadness and suffering I am watching an outlet because there is a moment when things are so sad, but also so sweet that I am broken down. The Vow did not deliver such a moment, and I was simply left feeling depressed. My friends and I walked away sad and dejected and wondering why the hell we paid good money to get bummed out.

Noteworthy:
The opening scene where they got in the car accident was interesting. When the car got hit, the scene suddenly transitioned into slow motion; so you actually saw Paige fly through the glass while Channing Tatum monologued about moments of impact. It was effective and my favorite part of the movie because it was a creative way to show "impact" that essentially created all of the problems. It was terrifying and surreal watching someone fly slow motion through a windshield, and because of the choice of music and lighting it really didn’t seem serious until everything returned to real time and she crashed onto the hood of the car.